2006 Mazda 2 vs. 1965 Zastava 1500

To start off, 2006 Mazda 2 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 2 (99 HP) has 46 more horse power than 1965 Zastava 1500. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1965 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda 2 weights approximately 175 kg more than 1965 Zastava 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1965 Zastava 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Zastava 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 2 (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Zastava 1500. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Zastava 1500.

Compare all specifications: