2006 Mazda 2 vs. 1978 Renault Alpine
To start off, 2006 Mazda 2 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Renault Alpine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Renault Alpine would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Renault Alpine is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Renault Alpine (148 HP) has 69 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 2. (79 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Renault Alpine should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 2.
Because 1978 Renault Alpine is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Renault Alpine. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Renault Alpine (204 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 2. (124 Nm). This means 1978 Renault Alpine will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 2 | 1978 Renault Alpine | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 2 | Alpine |
Year Released | 2006 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1388 cc | 2664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 124 Nm | 204 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 164 km/hour | 220 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 14.2 seconds | 7 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |