2006 Mazda 2 vs. 2004 Volvo S60

To start off, 2006 Mazda 2 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Volvo S60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Volvo S60 would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo S60 (247 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 2. (79 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo S60 weights approximately 441 kg more than 2006 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volvo S60 (330 Nm) has 206 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 2. (124 Nm). This means 2004 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 2.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Mazda 2 2004 Volvo S60
Make Mazda Volvo
Model 2 S60
Year Released 2006 2004
Body Type Hatchback Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1388 cc 2435 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 5 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 79 HP 247 HP
Engine RPM 5700 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 124 Nm 330 Nm
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1125 kg 1566 kg
Vehicle Length 3930 mm 4580 mm
Vehicle Width 1690 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1550 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2500 mm 2670 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 6.6 L/100km 10.2 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 45 L 70 L