2006 Mazda 2 vs. 2009 Peugeot 4007
To start off, 2009 Peugeot 4007 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda 2 would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Peugeot 4007 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Peugeot 4007 (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 2. (79 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Peugeot 4007 should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 2.
Because 2009 Peugeot 4007 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mazda 2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Peugeot 4007 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Peugeot 4007 (232 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 2. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Peugeot 4007 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda 2 | 2009 Peugeot 4007 | |
| Make | Mazda | Peugeot |
| Model | 2 | 4007 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1388 cc | 2359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 124 Nm | 232 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76.5 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
