2006 Mazda 2 vs. 2010 Daewoo Matiz
To start off, 2010 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda 2 would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 2 (99 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2010 Daewoo Matiz. (63 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 2010 Daewoo Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda 2 weights approximately 284 kg more than 2010 Daewoo Matiz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 2 (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Daewoo Matiz. (87 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Daewoo Matiz.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 2 | 2010 Daewoo Matiz | |
Make | Mazda | Daewoo |
Model | 2 | Matiz |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 63 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 87 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.1 mm | 68.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.4 mm | 67.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline - Premium |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 11.4 seconds | 13.7 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1155 kg | 871 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.1 L/100km | 6.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 35 L |