2006 Mazda 3 vs. 1942 Volvo PV 801-10
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Volvo PV 801-10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 3 (105 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1942 Volvo PV 801-10. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1942 Volvo PV 801-10.
Because 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Volvo PV 801-10. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda 3 | 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 | |
| Make | Mazda | Volvo |
| Model | 3 | PV 801-10 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1942 |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 3670 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 3260 mm |
