2006 Mazda 3 vs. 1946 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1946 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Volvo PV 60 weights approximately 390 kg more than 2006 Mazda 3.
Because 1946 Volvo PV 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Volvo PV 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 3 | 1946 Volvo PV 60 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 3 | PV 60 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1946 |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 3670 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 85 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1240 kg | 1630 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2850 mm |