2006 Mazda 3 vs. 1951 Saab 92
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Saab 92 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 3 (105 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1951 Saab 92. (24 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1951 Saab 92. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda 3 weights approximately 315 kg more than 1951 Saab 92. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Mazda 3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mazda 3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 Saab 92, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 3 | 1951 Saab 92 | |
Make | Mazda | Saab |
Model | 3 | 92 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1951 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2480 mm |