2006 Mazda 3 vs. 1961 MG MGA
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 MG MGA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 MG MGA would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2006 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 3 (139 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1961 MG MGA. (71 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1961 MG MGA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 MG MGA weights approximately 90 kg more than 2006 Mazda 3.
Because 1961 MG MGA is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 MG MGA. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 3 (182 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 MG MGA. (104 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 MG MGA.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 3 | 1961 MG MGA | |
Make | Mazda | MG |
Model | 3 | MGA |
Year Released | 2006 | 1961 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1489 cc |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 182 Nm | 104 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2390 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.3 L/100km | 10.6 L/100km |