2006 Mazda 3 vs. 1963 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2006 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 3 (139 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda 3 weights approximately 310 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 3 (182 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda 3 | 1963 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Mazda | Suzuki |
| Model | 3 | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 358 cc |
| Horse Power | 139 HP | 18 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 182 Nm | 32 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3700 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2060 mm |
