2006 Mazda 3 vs. 1965 Steyr 650T
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Steyr 650T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Steyr 650T would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2006 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 3 (150 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1965 Steyr 650T. (20 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1965 Steyr 650T.
Because 1965 Steyr 650T is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Steyr 650T. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 3 (183 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Steyr 650T. (40 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Steyr 650T.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda 3 | 1965 Steyr 650T | |
| Make | Mazda | Steyr |
| Model | 3 | 650T |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1965 |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 643 cc |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 20 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 183 Nm | 40 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 2970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1330 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 1850 mm |
