2006 Mazda 3 vs. 1970 Mercury Comet
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 3,272 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Mercury Comet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 3 (139 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1970 Mercury Comet. (90 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1970 Mercury Comet. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Mercury Comet weights approximately 500 kg more than 2006 Mazda 3.
Because 1970 Mercury Comet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Mercury Comet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Mercury Comet (209 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 3. (182 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1970 Mercury Comet will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 3 | 1970 Mercury Comet | |
Make | Mazda | Mercury |
Model | 3 | Comet |
Year Released | 2006 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3272 cc |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 182 Nm | 209 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2800 mm |