2006 Mazda 3 vs. 1975 Volvo 66
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2006 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 3 (139 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1975 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1975 Volvo 66.
Because 1975 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 3 (182 Nm) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Volvo 66. (94 Nm). This means 2006 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Volvo 66. 1975 Volvo 66 has automatic transmission and 2006 Mazda 3 has manual transmission. 2006 Mazda 3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1975 Volvo 66 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 3 | 1975 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 3 | 66 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1289 cc |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 182 Nm | 94 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.1 mm | 77 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 3910 mm |