2006 Mazda 3 vs. 1976 Volvo 66
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,598 cc, 2006 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1976 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda 3 | 1976 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Mazda | Volvo |
| Model | 3 | 66 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1289 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 56 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 73 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83.6 mm | 77 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1550 mm |
