2006 Mazda 3 vs. 1976 Zastava 1300
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2006 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 3 (139 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1976 Zastava 1300. (59 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1976 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Zastava 1300 weights approximately 150 kg more than 2006 Mazda 3.
Because 1976 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 3 (182 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 3 | 1976 Zastava 1300 | |
Make | Mazda | Zastava |
Model | 3 | 1300 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1976 |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1295 cc |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 182 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3100 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2430 mm |