2006 Mazda 3 vs. 1977 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Toyota Mark II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Toyota Mark II would be higher. At 1,988 cc (6 cylinders), 1977 Toyota Mark II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Toyota Mark II (106 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 3. (105 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1977 Toyota Mark II should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Toyota Mark II weights approximately 75 kg more than 2006 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1977 Toyota Mark II (170 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 3. (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1977 Toyota Mark II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda 3 | 1977 Toyota Mark II | |
| Make | Mazda | Toyota |
| Model | 3 | Mark II |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1977 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1988 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 170 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2590 mm |
