2006 Mazda 3 vs. 1978 Mercedes-Benz T
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mercedes-Benz T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mercedes-Benz T would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Mercedes-Benz T is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Mercedes-Benz T weights approximately 90 kg more than 2006 Mazda 3.
Because 1978 Mercedes-Benz T is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Mercedes-Benz T. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 3 | 1978 Mercedes-Benz T | |
Make | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 3 | T |
Year Released | 2006 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2307 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2800 mm |