2006 Mazda 3 vs. 1978 Simca 2 Litres
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Simca 2 Litres. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Simca 2 Litres would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2006 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Simca 2 Litres weights approximately 315 kg more than 2006 Mazda 3.
Because 1978 Simca 2 Litres is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Simca 2 Litres. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 3 | 1978 Simca 2 Litres | |
Make | Mazda | Simca |
Model | 3 | 2 Litres |
Year Released | 2006 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1981 cc |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2670 mm |