2006 Mazda 3 vs. 1983 Zastava 2101
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 2101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 2101 would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2006 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 3 (139 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 2101. (62 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 2101. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Zastava 2101 weights approximately 150 kg more than 2006 Mazda 3.
Because 1983 Zastava 2101 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Zastava 2101. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 3 (182 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 2101. (87 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 2101.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda 3 | 1983 Zastava 2101 | |
| Make | Mazda | Zastava |
| Model | 3 | 2101 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1983 |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1196 cc |
| Horse Power | 139 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 182 Nm | 87 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4080 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2430 mm |
