2006 Mazda 3 vs. 1987 Volvo 240
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Volvo 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Volvo 240 weights approximately 50 kg more than 2006 Mazda 3.
Because 1987 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1987 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 3 | 1987 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 3 | 240 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1987 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1986 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 96 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 82.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.6 mm | 93 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1240 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2660 mm |