2006 Mazda 3 vs. 1987 Volvo 760
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Volvo 760. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Volvo 760 would be higher. At 2,316 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Volvo 760 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Volvo 760 weights approximately 110 kg more than 2006 Mazda 3.
Because 1987 Volvo 760 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1987 Volvo 760. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 3 | 1987 Volvo 760 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 3 | 760 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1987 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2316 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 180 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.6 mm | 80 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1240 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2780 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 82 L |