2006 Mazda 3 vs. 1990 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2006 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 3 (150 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1990 Renault Clio. (62 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1990 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 3 (183 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Renault Clio. (118 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda 3 | 1990 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Mazda | Renault |
| Model | 3 | Clio |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1990 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1870 cc |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 183 Nm | 118 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 3710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1400 mm |
