2006 Mazda 3 vs. 1992 Porsche DP
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Porsche DP. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Porsche DP would be higher.
Because 1992 Porsche DP is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Porsche DP. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Porsche DP (881 Nm) has 699 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 3. (182 Nm). This means 1992 Porsche DP will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 3 | 1992 Porsche DP | |
Make | Mazda | Porsche |
Model | 3 | DP |
Year Released | 2006 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 182 Nm | 881 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2510 mm |