2006 Mazda 3 vs. 1993 Nissan Cima
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Nissan Cima. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Nissan Cima would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Nissan Cima is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Nissan Cima weights approximately 345 kg more than 2006 Mazda 3.
Because 1993 Nissan Cima is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Nissan Cima. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 3 | 1993 Nissan Cima | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | 3 | Cima |
Year Released | 2006 | 1993 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1770 mm |