2006 Mazda 3 vs. 1996 Rover 200
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2006 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 3 (139 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1996 Rover 200. (85 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Rover 200 weights approximately 325 kg more than 2006 Mazda 3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 3 (182 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 200. (170 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 3 | 1996 Rover 200 | |
Make | Mazda | Rover |
Model | 3 | 200 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1994 cc |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 182 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1135 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2510 mm |