2006 Mazda 3 vs. 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 would be higher. At 7,255 cc (12 cylinders), 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 weights approximately 1062 kg more than 2006 Mazda 3.
Because 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 has automatic transmission and 2006 Mazda 3 has manual transmission. 2006 Mazda 3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 3 | 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 | |
Make | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 3 | T V-12 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 7255 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 582 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1240 kg | 2302 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2810 mm |