2006 Mazda 3 vs. 1997 Saturn SL
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Saturn SL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Saturn SL would be higher. At 1,899 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Saturn SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 3 (105 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1997 Saturn SL. (100 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1997 Saturn SL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda 3 weights approximately 130 kg more than 1997 Saturn SL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Saturn SL (158 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 3. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1997 Saturn SL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 3 | 1997 Saturn SL | |
Make | Mazda | Saturn |
Model | 3 | SL |
Year Released | 2006 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1899 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 1055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1400 mm |