2006 Mazda 3 vs. 1998 Acura CL
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Acura CL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Acura CL would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Acura CL (150 HP) has 11 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 3. (139 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Acura CL weights approximately 770 kg more than 2006 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1998 Acura CL has automatic transmission and 2006 Mazda 3 has manual transmission. 2006 Mazda 3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Acura CL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 3 | 1998 Acura CL | |
Make | Mazda | Acura |
Model | 3 | CL |
Year Released | 2006 | 1998 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2300 cc |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 150 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4826 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1389 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2715 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 65 L |