2006 Mazda 3 vs. 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK

To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2006 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 3 (139 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK. (134 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 366 kg more than 2006 Mazda 3.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK (185 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 3. (182 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 3.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Mazda 3 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK
Make Mazda Mercedes-Benz
Model 3 CLK
Year Released 2006 1998
Body Type Hatchback Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1998 cc 1996 cc
Horse Power 139 HP 134 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 182 Nm 185 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 3700 RPM
Engine Bore Size 87.5 mm 89.9 mm
Engine Stroke Size 83.1 mm 78.7 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 10.6:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1134 kg 1500 kg
Vehicle Length 4710 mm 4580 mm
Vehicle Height 1490 mm 1350 mm
Wheelbase Size 2650 mm 2720 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 L 69 L