2006 Mazda 3 vs. 1999 Nissan C 52
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan C 52. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan C 52 would be higher. At 3,496 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Nissan C 52 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Nissan C 52 (152 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 3. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Nissan C 52 should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Nissan C 52 weights approximately 6 kg more than 2006 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan C 52 (354 Nm) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 3. (145 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan C 52 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 3 | 1999 Nissan C 52 | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | 3 | C 52 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 3496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 152 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 354 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 1 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1266 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2830 mm |