2006 Mazda 3 vs. 1999 Tata E220
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Tata E220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Tata E220 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Tata E220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 3 (150 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1999 Tata E220. (148 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1999 Tata E220.
Because 1999 Tata E220 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Tata E220. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Tata E220 (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 3. (183 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1999 Tata E220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda 3 | 1999 Tata E220 | |
| Make | Mazda | Tata |
| Model | 3 | E220 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2199 cc |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 183 Nm | 210 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2810 mm |
