2006 Mazda 3 vs. 2000 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2006 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 3 | 2000 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | 3 | Bluebird |
Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1499 cc |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1450 mm |