2006 Mazda 3 vs. 2004 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 200 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 3. (105 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1089 kg more than 2006 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 377 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 3. (145 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 3 | 2004 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | 3 | Armada |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 5556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 522 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 98.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.6 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 2274 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.2 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 106 L |