2006 Mazda 3 vs. 2004 Nissan Frontier
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Frontier. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Frontier would be higher. At 3,278 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Frontier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Frontier (181 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 3. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Frontier should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Frontier weights approximately 394 kg more than 2006 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Frontier (274 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 3. (240 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Frontier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 3 | 2004 Nissan Frontier | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | 3 | Frontier |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 3278 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 181 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 274 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.3 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.3:1 | 8.9:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1654 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 73 L |