2006 Mazda 3 vs. 2004 Rover 45
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Rover 45. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Rover 45 would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2006 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 3 (139 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2004 Rover 45. (115 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2004 Rover 45. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Rover 45 weights approximately 345 kg more than 2006 Mazda 3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 3 (182 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Rover 45. (160 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Rover 45.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda 3 | 2004 Rover 45 | |
| Make | Mazda | Rover |
| Model | 3 | 45 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1793 cc |
| Horse Power | 139 HP | 115 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 182 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2750 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83.1 mm | 89.3 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1155 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 55 L |
