2006 Mazda 3 vs. 2005 Mazda 6
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda 6 would be higher. Both 2006 Mazda 3 and 2005 Mazda 6 are equipped with a 1,998 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 3 (139 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2005 Mazda 6. (134 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda 6 weights approximately 600 kg more than 2006 Mazda 3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 182 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 3 | 2005 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | 3 | 6 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 182 Nm | 182 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.1 mm | 83.1 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.3 L/100km | 8.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 64 L |