2006 Mazda 3 vs. 2007 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2007 Ford Ecosport is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2006 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 3 (139 HP) has 72 more horse power than 2007 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2007 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2006 Mazda 3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mazda 3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda 3 | 2007 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Mazda | Ford |
| Model | 3 | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2007 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1400 cc |
| Horse Power | 139 HP | 67 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2490 mm |
