2006 Mazda 3 vs. 2008 Peugeot 307
To start off, 2008 Peugeot 307 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2006 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 3 (139 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2008 Peugeot 307. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2008 Peugeot 307. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Peugeot 307 weights approximately 594 kg more than 2006 Mazda 3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Peugeot 307 (205 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 3. (182 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2008 Peugeot 307 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 3 | 2008 Peugeot 307 | |
Make | Mazda | Peugeot |
Model | 3 | 307 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1997 cc |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 182 Nm | 205 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 1900 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.1 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 17.6:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1404 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.3 L/100km | 5.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 60 L |