2006 Mazda 3 vs. 2010 Lincoln MKS
To start off, 2010 Lincoln MKS is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Lincoln MKS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Lincoln MKS (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 3. (150 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Lincoln MKS should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Lincoln MKS (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 3. (183 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2010 Lincoln MKS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 3 | 2010 Lincoln MKS | |
Make | Mazda | Lincoln |
Model | 3 | MKS |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 3700 cc |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 273 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 183 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 5184 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1928 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1565 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2868 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 6.7 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 8.4 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 76 L |