2006 Mazda 3 vs. 2010 Nissan Patrol
To start off, 2010 Nissan Patrol is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 4,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Patrol is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Patrol (280 HP) has 130 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 3. (150 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Patrol should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 3.
Because 2010 Nissan Patrol is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Patrol will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan Patrol (399 Nm) has 216 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 3. (183 Nm). This means 2010 Nissan Patrol will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda 3 | 2010 Nissan Patrol | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | 3 | Patrol |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 4500 cc |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 280 HP |
| Torque | 183 Nm | 399 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 5140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1995 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1940 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 3075 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 98 L |
