2006 Mazda 3 vs. 2010 Tata Safari
To start off, 2010 Tata Safari is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 2,179 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Tata Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 3 (139 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2010 Tata Safari. (138 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2010 Tata Safari. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Tata Safari weights approximately 786 kg more than 2006 Mazda 3.
Because 2010 Tata Safari is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Tata Safari will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Tata Safari (320 Nm @ 1700 RPM) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 3. (182 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2010 Tata Safari will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 3 | 2010 Tata Safari | |
Make | Mazda | Tata |
Model | 3 | Safari |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2179 cc |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 182 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 1700 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 1920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1930 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2660 mm |