2006 Mazda 3 vs. 2011 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2011 Holden Colorado is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Colorado (161 HP) has 22 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 3. (139 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 3.
Because 2011 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Colorado (360 Nm) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 3. (182 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda 3 | 2011 Holden Colorado | |
| Make | Mazda | Holden |
| Model | 3 | Colorado |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3000 cc |
| Horse Power | 139 HP | 161 HP |
| Torque | 182 Nm | 360 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
