2006 Mazda 3 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 3 (105 HP) has 31 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo (190 Nm) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 3. (146 Nm). This means 2012 Chevrolet Aveo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda 3 | 2012 Chevrolet Aveo | |
| Make | Mazda | Chevrolet |
| Model | 3 | Aveo |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1248 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 74 HP |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 190 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4039 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1516 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2525 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 46 L |
