2006 Mazda 3 vs. 2012 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2012 Holden Cruze is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2006 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Cruze (161 HP) has 11 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 3. (150 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Cruze (360 Nm) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 3. (183 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 3 | 2012 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Mazda | Holden |
Model | 3 | Cruze |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1991 cc |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 161 HP |
Torque | 183 Nm | 360 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2685 mm |