2006 Mazda 3 vs. 2012 Mercedes-Benz G
To start off, 2012 Mercedes-Benz G is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Mercedes-Benz G is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mercedes-Benz G (382 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 232 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 3. (150 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz G should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 3.
Because 2012 Mercedes-Benz G is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz G will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mercedes-Benz G (530 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 347 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 3. (183 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2012 Mercedes-Benz G will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda 3 | 2012 Mercedes-Benz G | |
| Make | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | 3 | G |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 5500 cc |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 382 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 183 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4686 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1824 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1930 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2850 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 6.7 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 8.4 L/100km | 19.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 96 L |
