2006 Mazda 3 vs. 2013 Dodge DART
To start off, 2013 Dodge DART is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda 3 would be higher. Both 2006 Mazda 3 and 2013 Dodge DART are equipped with a 1,999 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Dodge DART (158 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 3. (150 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Dodge DART should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Dodge DART (197 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 3. (183 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2013 Dodge DART will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 3 | 2013 Dodge DART | |
Make | Mazda | Dodge |
Model | 3 | DART |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1999 cc |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 183 Nm | 197 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4672 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1465 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2703 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 6.7 L/100km | 5.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 8.4 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 60 L |