2006 Mazda 3 vs. 2013 Honda Crosstour
To start off, 2013 Honda Crosstour is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 3,471 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Honda Crosstour is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Honda Crosstour weights approximately 605 kg more than 2006 Mazda 3.
Because 2013 Honda Crosstour is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Honda Crosstour will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Honda Crosstour has automatic transmission and 2006 Mazda 3 has manual transmission. 2006 Mazda 3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Honda Crosstour will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 3 | 2013 Honda Crosstour | |
Make | Mazda | Honda |
Model | 3 | Crosstour |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 3471 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 274 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.6 mm | 93 mm |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1240 kg | 1845 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4999 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1898 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2797 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 70 L |