2006 Mazda 3 vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda 3 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Countryman weights approximately 200 kg more than 2006 Mazda 3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Countryman (240 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 3. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Countryman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 3 | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Mazda | Mini |
Model | 3 | Countryman |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.6 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 1385 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 47 L |