2006 Mazda 5 vs. 1970 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2006 Mazda 5 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Oldsmobile Cutlass (160 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 5. (157 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 5.
Because 1970 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Oldsmobile Cutlass (380 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 5. (201 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1970 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 5.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda 5 | 1970 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Mazda | Oldsmobile |
| Model | 5 | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2262 cc | 5735 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 157 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 201 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2960 mm |
