2006 Mazda 5 vs. 1975 Oldsmobile Ninety-Eight
To start off, 2006 Mazda 5 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Oldsmobile Ninety-Eight. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Oldsmobile Ninety-Eight would be higher. At 5,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1975 Oldsmobile Ninety-Eight is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Oldsmobile Ninety-Eight (160 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 5. (157 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1975 Oldsmobile Ninety-Eight should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 5.
Because 1975 Oldsmobile Ninety-Eight is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Oldsmobile Ninety-Eight. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Oldsmobile Ninety-Eight (380 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 5. (201 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1975 Oldsmobile Ninety-Eight will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 5.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda 5 | 1975 Oldsmobile Ninety-Eight | |
| Make | Mazda | Oldsmobile |
| Model | 5 | Ninety-Eight |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2262 cc | 5735 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 157 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 201 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 5900 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3230 mm |
